[anonsec] Typo in core draft

[Sam Hartman]

+ bind the same public key. These certificates need not to have been
+ pre-shared with their peers (e.g., because ephermal, self-signed).


The current text sounds like a requirement that certificates are not
shared with peers. I think it's more like "These certificates do not
need to be "

Am I correct on this point? If so, feel free to either submit a new
ID or give me an rfc editor note to apply in the tracker.



Either way I'll put this on the agenda for next week.

[Nicolas Williams]

Post by Sam Hartman
+ bind the same public key. These certificates need not to have been
+ pre-shared with their peers (e.g., because ephermal, self-signed).
The current text sounds like a requirement that certificates are not
shared with peers. I think it's more like "These certificates do not
need to be "

Yes, that's correct -- the word "do" is missing and should be inserted
before "need to be".

Post by Sam Hartman
Am I correct on this point? If so, feel free to either submit a new
ID or give me an rfc editor note to apply in the tracker.

The note is this:

Add the word "do" before "need to" in the last sentence of the
parapgraph that starts "Nodes wishing to be treated as BTNS
nodes..." in section 2.

Post by Sam Hartman
Either way I'll put this on the agenda for next week.

Thanks.

[Sam Hartman]

I've inserted the following into the ballot:

Note to RFC Editor

Section 2:
old: bind the same public key. These certificates need not to have been
new: bind the same public key. These certificates do not need to be