Julien Laganier
2008-01-03 16:59:17 UTC
That note was sent to the list but dropped. Here it comes.
--julien
----------------------------------------------------------------
The IESG has received a request from the Better-Than-Nothing Security WG
(btns) to consider the following document:
- 'Better-Than-Nothing-Security: An Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec '
? ?<draft-ietf-btns-core-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. ?Please send substantive comments to the
ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2008-01-09. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-btns-core-05.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=14291&rfc_flag=0
--julien
----------------------------------------------------------------
The IESG has received a request from the Better-Than-Nothing Security WG
(btns) to consider the following document:
- 'Better-Than-Nothing-Security: An Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec '
? ?<draft-ietf-btns-core-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. ?Please send substantive comments to the
ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2008-01-09. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-btns-core-05.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=14291&rfc_flag=0