Julien Laganier
2007-03-21 18:28:57 UTC
[Apologize for resending, I made a slight error in the
previous report]
The BTNS WG met shortly on Wednesday at IETF68.
The problem and applicability statement will be
submitted to IESG for publication as Experimental RFC
after the IETF general meeting.
We had a short update on the core document describing
BTNS, it will be WGLC'ed after the IETF general
meeting.
The connexion latching describing how to bind a given
ULP communication (e.g. a TCP connexion) to a single
BTNS SA was presented by Nico Williams. It needs more
review and discussion and will then be WGLC'ed.
Two API documents were presented: an abstract API (by
Michael Richardson) inspired by the GSS API and a C
language one (by Miika Komu). They need to be reviewed
and discussed on the mailing list before we adopt them
as WG draft.
Due to lack of time the IKE extensions document could
not be presented by Michael Richardson. It needs
discussion on the mailing list.
Best,
-- Julien & Love
previous report]
The BTNS WG met shortly on Wednesday at IETF68.
The problem and applicability statement will be
submitted to IESG for publication as Experimental RFC
after the IETF general meeting.
We had a short update on the core document describing
BTNS, it will be WGLC'ed after the IETF general
meeting.
The connexion latching describing how to bind a given
ULP communication (e.g. a TCP connexion) to a single
BTNS SA was presented by Nico Williams. It needs more
review and discussion and will then be WGLC'ed.
Two API documents were presented: an abstract API (by
Michael Richardson) inspired by the GSS API and a C
language one (by Miika Komu). They need to be reviewed
and discussed on the mailing list before we adopt them
as WG draft.
Due to lack of time the IKE extensions document could
not be presented by Michael Richardson. It needs
discussion on the mailing list.
Best,
-- Julien & Love